HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

topic posted Thu, December 29, 2005 - 12:31 AM by  Edwin
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement

HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd.
HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd. HArold Lloyd.

Notice how many "HA's" there are in Harold? Millions.

Okay, I admit: my first paragraph was a sight gag. Something Harold
Lloyd could do better than anyone else.

And, of all his features (I say features as in "films" not facial—but
he had some pretty great facial features, too), I consider his five
best to be For Heaven's Sake, Girl Shy, Movie Crazy, Speedy and Safety
Last. Not necessarily in that order. (Yes, The Freshman failed to make
MY top five Lloyd list, as did The Sin of Harold Diddlebock—aka Mad
Wednesday—although both are among his ten best works, for sure.)

And, of all his feature films, I consider this one—Safety Last—as being
his signature film—and, if not his very best, his most famous.

Yes, like I said, laughs come first in Safety Last.

It moves like a bat out of Brooklyn; yet, masterfully, holds (tugs!) at
our heartstrings.

Laughter with thrills, thrills with laughter—that's what Harold Lloyd
did better than anyone. And in this masterwork, sight gags abound as
the "human fly" (with the trademark glasses) climbs up the side of a
building. (This is a decade BEFORE King Kong, mind you.)

It's an early Twenties snapshot/slap-shot that moves non-stop and goes
every which way, including up, up, up. A building, that is.

Forget The Jazz Age, folks, THIS personifies "The Harold Age"—and, as
old as this film might be (and as I write this lil' piece, Safety Last
is 83 years young) it doesn't limp. In fact, this film, in the artistic
sense, has barely aged—and still runs circles around today's so-called
modern comedies.

My face hurt from laughing so much, so I can only imagine what it
must've been like to have seen it back then when it was first
released—in a packed theater howling with laughter.

Hell, he even married his leading lady shortly after filming, so you're
also getting a REAL honest-to-goodness love story, to boot.

What else can I say? I love this guy. I love this film.

Every little gesture and every little gag gets a giggle. Some a roar.
And, hey, the story ain't so bad, either.

Okay, I rest my case. Harold, you were (and still are) the greatest of
the greats.

You may be resting in peace but you've left us rolling in the
proverbial aisles.

That's all I've got to say. Now go get it and watch it and laugh like
hell.
posted by:
Edwin
California
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

    Thu, December 29, 2005 - 10:12 AM
    I completely agree about "Safety Last". Even though I knew he would make it safely to the top, I was still on the edge of my seat during the building climbing. It was evident that there was *no* safety net of any kind.

    They would certainly never let a leading man do a stunt like that nowadays!
    • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

      Thu, December 29, 2005 - 4:20 PM
      And he did it with one hand. The right hand, which only had a couple fingers, I believe his pinky and ring finger, relied on a rubber glove to give the illusion that he had two hands. Whatta guy!
      • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

        Thu, December 29, 2005 - 6:07 PM
        Right! I forgot about that. He lost his fingers while getting his photo taken when he picked up what he thought was a fake bomb.

        Amazing.

        Does anyone know if Woody Allen was influenced by Lloyd? I noticed some similarities while watching Lloyd.
        • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

          Thu, December 29, 2005 - 10:09 PM
          Absolutely. In fact, when Woody isn't emulating Bob Hope's cowering coward, he's doing Harold Lloyd's hysterical heroics. Most definitely, the greats are influenced by the greats, and who's greater than Harold Lloyd?
          • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

            Sun, February 26, 2006 - 9:05 PM
            Wasn't Lucille Ball trained by Buster Keaton and Red Skelton?
            • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

              Wed, August 8, 2007 - 8:39 PM
              Buster worked with Lucille Ball on gags and timing. He also prepped Red Skelton who exactly recreated some of Buster's gags in his own films, such as the one from The Cameraman where he leaps onto the fire truck hoping to get exclusive footage of a fire only to have it turn and drive into the station, or the one from Spite Marriage in which Buster destroys the sets of a Civil War play in which his character is an extra. Buster worked as well with the Marx Brothers and Abbot and Costello as a gag consultant, but he was less than impressed by them. They showed not the slightest interest in the set ups or how the gag was worked out, and this rankled him because as he said when he and his team made films they ate, slept and dreamt them.
    • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

      Wed, August 8, 2007 - 8:27 PM
      Not to take anything away from Lloyd, but the stunts in Safety Last were not nearly as dangerous as is alleged. The close ups and mid shots of Lloyd climbing the building were filmed on a series of sets built atop a tall building, as was the one of him hanging from the clock hands. Had Lloyd fallen it would have been onto a no doubt padded roof and not twenty stories to the street. True there were no effects, but all silent comedies made use of photographic perspective. The long shots of Lloyd climbing the building were of the real human fly, Bill Strother, whose exploits had inspired the film, and who portrayed Lloyd's roommate.

      Keaton employed something similar in Three Ages where he appears to use a skylight cover as a diving board to try to leap from one building to another while about 14 stories in the air, and doesn't make it. In actuality he was on a set built atop the old Hill Street Tunnel in downtown LA. All the same he was quite bruised from hitting the wall before tumbling into the net, so rather than re-shoot the scene he and his gag men came up with the idea of the awning which would break his fall enough for him to grab a rain spout, which would pull away from the wall carry him out and down and hurl him through a window of a fire station across the floor to the fire pole and down to the ground where he clambers onto the back of a fire truck as it leaves the station. One of the great things that came from not working from written scripts was the possibility of getting something better from gags which didn't go according to plan.
      • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

        Thu, August 9, 2007 - 7:48 AM
        Part of what broke Keaton's down was that MGM gave him less and less room to improvise-- demanding detailed breakdowns of every one of hs gags and tableaux. Keaton, though he had smaller budgets in his pre-MGM days, was, like Chaplin, an indie-filmmaker and so he had the freedom to be creative.

        Though back to Lloyd: His stunts are truely breathtaking, but I don't feel that his Glasses character dates as well for the modern viewer compared to either Chaplin's Tramp or Keaton's Buster. Though, one never knows-- that sort of character may come back into vogue.
        • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

          Thu, August 9, 2007 - 1:48 PM
          For me, Keaton always seems modern, even timeless, while Lloyd and especially Chaplin are relics of an earlier era.
          • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

            Thu, August 9, 2007 - 4:52 PM
            Chaplin (and you really have to distinguish between him and his chracters, because he had several distinct film persona, even if they had the same mustache) is for me, as timeless as commedia dell'arte and Shakespeare as a creator of characters. Keaton, on the other hand, is a much more modern filmmaker who really understood the potentiality of the technology as well as being a great performer.

            Lloyd's thrill sequences are brilliant even by today's standards-- indeed, they are more over the top than most modern day action movies-- it's the story elements during the non-thrill sequences that seem dated-- the constant sexist idealization of women-- the constant racist stereotypes, et cetera.
            • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

              Thu, August 9, 2007 - 8:14 PM
              In one sense I agree. Chaplin himself said he hated the character he created at Keystone until he realized he could be seen as a sort of Pierrot figure; thus the timeless quality. On the other hand the character of the little tramp is dated by its reliance on pathos and Victorian sentimentality. I always find myself torn, admiring his pantomime skills while feeling distanced by his shameless milking of the audience for sympathy. Keaton once said that the audience might well feel sorry for the predicaments in which his character found himself, but he made damned sure never to ask for sympathy in his portrayal. Lloyd's character was of the 20th century but that of a preppy go-getter type. Keaton is the stoic everyman quizzically enduring whatever the world throws at him. He's the most modern of the three and also perhaps the most archetypal. It's not surprising that Beckett wrote the character of Lucky in Godot with Keaton in mind, and even offered him the part in the first production, but Eleanor didn't understand the play and convinced him to turn it down.
              • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                Thu, August 9, 2007 - 9:26 PM
                Chaplin dispenses with the sentimentality at times-- and at those points he is brilliant. On the other hand, the appealing to the audience is a stage convention that it took many stage actors a long time to dispense during the early days of film. I can also say as someone who does perform commedia dell'arte, that appealing to the audience is sometimes part of the style-- especially for the zanni characters.
              • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                Fri, August 10, 2007 - 6:54 AM
                Yes, but when Beckett and Keaton finally did work together on a film project, they did not get along. Keaton thrived on improvisation while Beckett was so insistant that that his scripts be performed exactly as written that he was known to sue theatre companies that took any interpretive liberties with costumes or set design.
                • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                  Fri, August 10, 2007 - 8:13 AM
                  I think that Keaton's disagreements with Beckett and the director of Film, whose name escapes me, were due to their complete ignorance with regard to film technique, and their disdain for his ideas. Here they had one of the great filmmakers of all time at their disposal and refused to listen to anything he suggested. Keaton was also pretty sick by then and wearing the heavy coat in hot New York summer weather took its toll. I think he would have made a great Lucky had he taken that part a decade earlier on the stage.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                    Fri, August 10, 2007 - 3:36 PM
                    It's amazing, isn't it, that Keaton, who truly was one of the greatest filmmakers of all time (I place him in the narrow pantheon that includes Griffith, Kurosawa, Bergman, and only a few others) was limited to quite a short span of active production. All his masterpieces were made in a span of less than ten years. One can only wonder what might have happened if Joe Schenck had not sold his studio to MGM... imagine Buster and his crew working together in their special way in the medium of sound film... how many more masterpieces might we be able to enjoy today?

                    I'm reminded of the short but meteoric career of Preston Sturges as a star writer/director. Again, in a short period of less than ten years, he made a goodly number of the greatest comedies ever created -- and then, poof, no more.

                    OK, I know I'm way off the subject of the original thread (and even outside the tribe's description!), but I just had to share.
                    • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                      Sun, September 9, 2007 - 7:01 AM
                      The wikipedia article on "Film" has a lot of material about the working relationship between Beckett, Keaton and Schneider:

                      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_%28film%29
                      • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                        Sun, September 9, 2007 - 1:36 PM
                        Some questionable claims made in this article.

                        <old, broke, ill, and alone — some $2 million ahead in a four-handed poker game with an imaginary Louis B. Mayer of MGM and two other invisible Hollywood moguls.>

                        I don't believe Keaton was broke, I think he was working as hard as did to provide for Eleanor after his death. And though he was ill he merely thought he had bronchitis. In fact he was never told that he had lung cancer. A small point but the imaginary game with Mayer was, I believe, bridge and not poker. Keaton was a bridge fanatic. He met Eleanor when she began showing up with friends to play bridge at his house, though it took months before he really noticed her. Louise Brooks went so far as to blame his financial problems in the late 20's on trying to keep up with high stakes players like Mayer.

                        Keaton said of Film that he wasn't used to having the camera behind him all the time. According to his friend James Karen, what Buster didn't get about Film was "their goddamned amateurism. These were people who had given him a script which didn't make sense. It was anti-film."

                        The article makes it sound like Keaton was washed up, withdrawn, waiting to die, but this was before he did The Railrodder, which is a brilliant film, and before he worked with Richard Lester on A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum. Lester knew Keaton's films and had enormous respect for him as a filmmaker.

                        The accompanying documentary to The Railrodder, Buster Keaton Rides Again, doesn't show a withdrawn man in the least. He nearly bursts into tears arguing for doing a gag that the director thinks is too dangerous. He says if they don't allow him to do it his way, he won't be able to match scenes. In the end he gets his way. Potterton, the director, later visited Keaton in Woodland Hills, and Buster took him to meet Stan Laurel. He listened to the two of them talk shop and said "it was terrific, there was no sadness in either of them.

                        According to Marion Meade neither Beckett nor Schneider were familiar with Keaton's silent films, though they pretended they were. They merely knew he was an actor from that era. Schneider treated Keaton as if he were the amateur. Compare Film to absurdist visions like The Paleface or Cops and the former retreats into insignificance.
                        • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                          Sun, September 9, 2007 - 5:08 PM
                          I thought the version of events in the article on "Film" were interesting because they were a Beckett-centric acount and quite different from aconts I had read before. However, the image of Keaton lecturing Beckett and Schneider on basic film making technique is quite appealing, whether it is true or not.
        • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

          Thu, August 9, 2007 - 8:32 PM
          Yes, Keaton once mused that he couldn't understand why MGM wanted him since they showed no interest in any of his myriad skills. The Cameraman is a great example of what he might have continued to do if MGM had not insisted on his conforming to their system. For The Cameraman they saddled him with a huge number of writers, endless subplots involving gangsters and what not, but when it came to filming the story on location in New York it proved impossible. Buster drew enormous crowds everywhere they tried to film. Finally he called Thalberg and convinced him that the script had to be abandoned. They shot a few scenes really early on a Sunday morning and the great baseball pantomime inning in an empty Yankee stadium and then returned to Hollywood and finished the film in tried and true Keaton style on MGM's backlot. It was such a success that you would have thought the moguls would have been loathe to mess with a good thing, but they drew the wrong lesson from the proceedings and clamped down even harder on him, stripped him of his team and tried to turn him into something he wasn't. Really though, few if any of the silent auteurs were able to make a smooth transition to the sound era, which had everything to do with the evolution of the studios and little else. Chaplin and Lloyd were insulated by their shrewd business minds, but even they found themselves at loose ends for some years.
          • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

            Sat, August 11, 2007 - 11:17 PM
            <<Lloyd's thrill sequences are brilliant even by today's standards-- indeed, they are more over the top than most modern day action movies-- it's the story elements during the non-thrill sequences that seem dated-- the constant sexist idealization of women-- the constant racist stereotypes, et cetera.>>

            I don't remember a lot of those in Harold Lloyd movies (though it has been a while since I've last seen some of them), but I certainly recall more than one demeaning stereotype in Buster Keaton's. They disfigure parts of SEVEN CHANCES, which is in many ways Buster's most lyrically beautiful film.

            Harold Lloyd is immortal because he typifies a type of humanity (go-getting American boy) that'll live on in folklore long after America itself ceases to exist. That's pretty far from being his ultimate value, though. He was quite the Jazz Age satirist.
            • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

              Sun, August 12, 2007 - 1:12 AM
              <but I certainly recall more than one demeaning stereotype in Buster Keaton's. They disfigure parts of SEVEN CHANCES, which is in many ways Buster's most lyrically beautiful film. >

              I don't particularly like Seven Chances, but I don't recall any demeaning stereotypes in it, unless you mean all the women, who were employed as little more than props. Maybe I'm just forgetting some passing scene, or thinking it was in one of the other films. I can recall scenes in College and Neighbors which are questionable, but in College at least, the joke is on Buster himself. Buster didn't like Seven Chances. Schenck had purchased the property for him without his knowledge and he felt he had no choice but to film it, particularly as he owed Schenck money and felt obligated by his generosity in having cut Buster in for a piece of the Hollywood Roosevelt Hotel. He thought the result was pretty weak, but at one of the pre-screenings he noticed the audience laughing at one point. When they examined the film they noticed Buster had dislodged a few stones as he started down the hill and they were trailing after him, which gave them the idea for the onslaught of paper maiche boulders, which as Buster put it, saved the picture.
              • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                Sun, August 12, 2007 - 2:06 AM
                <<but I don't recall any demeaning stereotypes in it,>>

                In one scene toward the beginning, Buster is practicing proposing (he has to have a bride by 7pm or lose seven million dollars) and one of the first women he meets is a looker who catches his eye. He makes ready with the proposal, only to back away with a look of distaste when she unfolds a Hebrew newspaper.
                • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                  Sun, August 12, 2007 - 3:03 AM
                  I just watched the entire film again, and that scene has him beginning to propose to a woman sitting on a bench, who looks at him uncomprehendingly and then unfolds a newspaper written in Hebrew and he realizes she doesn't speak English. I didn't see any look of distaste. It's in the same spirit as the ethnic premise of My Wife's Relations. The scene builds the gag by him attempting to propose to every woman he encounters including a hair stylist's head replica and a female impersonator. He also walks up behind a woman readying his proposal until he sees she's black, but again it's part of this series to show his desperation.

                  In the scene at the club one of the women is his sister-in-law Constance Talmadge, but I can't tell which one. Does anybody know? I noticed that the list of his seven chances contains Bartine Burkett his co-star from The High Sign and Doris Deane, Arbuckle's second wife.
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                    Sun, August 12, 2007 - 9:42 AM
                    The scene in question: The woman is reading "The Forward" which was a Yiddish, not Hebrew, language newspaper (it may still exist.) The joke can be read a number of ways:

                    1.) He might consider her unstuitable because she is Jewish (or at least his family and neighbors would not approve.)
                    2.) She might not be interested in marrying a gentile in a Christian church.
                    3.) The woman doesn't speak English and doesn't understand his proposal.
                    4.) The woman is a socialist (The Foward was a socialist newspaper) and so their politics might be incompatable.

                    Even if the joke betrays an earlier era's views on mixed marriages, the point is that the woman isn't a negative stereotype of Jewish women. However whenever I've seen Jews or African Americans portrayed in Lloyd's films, they are generally done as the most blatent racist stereotype-- look at the Jewish shopkeeper in "Safety Last"-- and I've certainly seen some "sambo" types in one short film of Lloyd's.

                    I really can't recall any racial images of that degree in a Keaton film-- and certainly not in any Chaplin film I've seen (outside the Roma "Gypsies" in "The Vagabond.")
                    • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                      Sun, August 12, 2007 - 10:05 AM
                      The painfully slow wagon driver sent to carry the message from the fiancee in SEVEN CHANCES wasn't another such stereotype? It's been years since I've seen it, but...

                      <<look at the Jewish shopkeeper in "Safety Last"-- and I've certainly seen some "sambo" types in one short film of Lloyd's.>>

                      I'd forgotten about that one. Some comedians were really gross with this kind of "humor"- Mack Sennett for example.

                      <<4.) The woman is a socialist (The Foward was a socialist newspaper) and so their politics might be incompatable. >>

                      THAT is a bit of a stretch!

                      Occam's Razor would cut this more simply-

                      5) Keaton wasn't above a cheap laugh at the expense of Jewish people.
                      • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                        Sun, August 12, 2007 - 12:45 PM
                        It's clear in the scene that she doesn't understand him. He makes his appeal and she merely shrugs and turns to her newspaper, which is when he notices it isn't in English.
                        • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                          Sun, August 12, 2007 - 4:51 PM
                          I personally think Gidouille's interpretation is the strongest-- that it was simply dramatizing that they were speaking different languages. I presented the others as alternatives. Still-- even at it's worst, it's still no where near as vicious as the stereotype of a Jewish shopkeeper in "Safety Last"-- which is a pretty classic anti-Semitic portrayal- the sort of thing one sees in Nazi-era cartoons.

                          And yes, "The Forward" was well known as a socialist newspaper (certainly, Keaton, as a vaudevillian who had at times lived in New York would have known this) -- so a socialist marrying a millionaire would have been another unacceptable pairing.

                          Buster's father was, on the other hand, very well known for using outrageous ethnic stereotypes in his stage act.
                          • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                            Sun, August 12, 2007 - 5:01 PM
                            I'm aware of the Forward. I think this is straining a bit, especially since political radicalism in Buster Keaton cinema (as well as 1920s American cinema in general) was usually depicted on the level of the bomb-chucking terrorist in "Cops."

                            <<Buster's father was, on the other hand, very well known for using outrageous ethnic stereotypes in his stage act. >>

                            Then why not Buster?
                          • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                            Sun, August 12, 2007 - 8:31 PM
                            <Buster's father was, on the other hand, very well known for using outrageous ethnic stereotypes in his stage act.>

                            Yes, but only Irish so far as I'm aware, not Jewish. Jewish stereotypes were one of the stock characters of vaudeville though, often portrayed by comics who were themselves Jewish. such as Weber and Fields. In the early Keystones Ford Sterling, who was not Jewish I don't believe, portrayed broad stereotyped Jews. These characterizations were often aimed at entertaining the very people being portrayed, recent immigrants, but they were so broad they weren't funny and died out pretty quickly.
                    • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                      Mon, August 20, 2007 - 5:26 PM
                      I checked and "The Forward" still exists and is still quite proud of its roots in trade unionism and democratic socialism. I don't know if the rest of America would have gotten the idea that this was an upper-class fop courting a socialist, but viewers in New York, would have gotten it. On the other hand, I'm not sure how many Americans outside of the major cities would have even recognized the letters as anything but "a foreign language."
                  • This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.

                    Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                    Sun, August 12, 2007 - 1:34 PM
                    Well, I found the answer to one question. Constance isn't in the country club scene, she's the woman driving along when Buster pulls up alongside trying to propose, until he runs into a tree and she keeps going.
                    • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                      Sun, August 12, 2007 - 10:32 PM
                      Nice piece of research!

                      You know, I used to not be a big fan of Seven Chances, but it's really grown on me over the years. Granted, it's not at the same level of cinematic genius as Sherlock Jr., Our Hospitality, Steamboat Bill, or his greatest masterpiece, The General -- but after having seen almost all of Buster's films several times each, I find myself laughing at Seven Chances even harder than the others. It's just flat-out hilarious.
                      • Re: HAROLD LLOYD, SUPER FLY.

                        Sun, August 12, 2007 - 10:51 PM
                        I must admit I enjoyed it more watching it again last night than I had in the past. I usually skip ahead to the chase scene and only watch the last half, so a few of the scenes at the beginning were not quite as I remembered them and much funnier.
  • More Thoughts on Harold

    Wed, September 12, 2007 - 12:06 AM
    Walter Kerr, in The Silent Clowns, quotes Hal Roach speaking of Harold Lloyd in conversation with William K. Everson, "of course he wasn't funny in himself; he needed his writers and a constant stream of gags. I remember in our early days together he was always so concerned about being a comedian all the time. A transition shot might just call for him to walk out of a door and across a room. Midway he'd stop in his tracks, turn to me and say, "what do I do to be funny."

    Kerr's first chapter on Lloyd is entitled "Hard Work". Lloyd had none of the natural gifts of Keaton and Chaplin, and where they established their characters and particular film visions almost at once, Lloyd took years of effort to even discover the beginnings of his. I've not seen any of the Lonesome Luke films, but they were in his own words, frenetic imitations of Chaplin. He didn't hit on the glasses character until 1917 when he'd already made 80 - 100 films, and even then, as Kerr notes, it took a couple more years for him to define himself. He grew into the part of playing himself. In the commentary to Safety Last, Richard Correll, who'd met him as a child, says, you want to know what Harold Lloyd was like, he was like this guy. It was pure will and calculation that created Lloyd's art.

    Correll explains in detail how the climbing shots were done. Some people maintain that the demystifying of gags and stunts somehow diminishes them. I disagree, the physical work speaks for itself, some of the smallest gags are the most mysterious and more impressive in their way than the spectacular stunts.

    Bill Strothers, who plays Lloyd's roommate and was meant to do the climb, was an iron worker who as a hobby climbed buildings. It was seeing him one day which gave Lloyd the idea of Safety Last. Strothers had broken his leg and was only recently out of a cast before filming began. You can see that he favors one leg when climbing the building to escape the cop. The long shots of Harold's climb and those shot from directly above show Bill Strothers. Lloyd and Roach insisted he be on a wire, though he felt it was unnecessary. The scenes at the base of the building were done at the Roach Studios in Culver City.

    Harold's climb was shot on 18 foot prop facades, built atop three successively taller buildings from four to about ten stories. Below him, about 20 feet usually, was a padded platform which would be moved up as he climbed. Apparently, off the corner to his right there was nothing between he and the street, but straight below was part of the roof of the building and the platform. The grooves in the wood walls allowed him to reach over the lip providing a much better grip than the corresponding slots in the side of a masonry building. Harold is doubled in the scene where he's swinging by a rope which has gotten wrapped around his ankle. I'm not sure who by, however. Correll himself seems not to know about the latest tidbit, revealed only last year by film historian Jeffrey Vance, that Lloyd's assistant director, Robert A. Golden, doubled him frequently between 1921 to 27, and that it's Golden in the scene where Lloyd shimmies on the ledge after the mouse has run up his trouser leg. I've looked at that scene over and over recently, and it certainly looks like Lloyd, but then his character's look is a bit nondescript. Does knowing any of this diminish his performance? Not in my view. At one point they tested the platform by dropping a dummy on it. It bounced off and went over the edge. Lloyd dislocated his shoulder doing the clock scene. I must say the longer 70 minute version makes for a much stronger film with many clever gags before the climb occurs. His team seems loath to abandon a gag without compounding it three times.

    In an earlier thrill comedy, Never Weaken, in which he inadvertently ends up on girders , Lloyd's set was built atop the Hill Street Tunnel, employing the same perspective of great height, which Keaton would use so effectively a couple years later in Three Ages.

    As good as Safety Last is, Girl Shy, his first independent release is probably a better film, a very sweet romance with Jobyna Ralston, capped by an astounding dash across Los Angeles, in which Harold employs stolen cars, a police motorbike, horse drawn wagon, and electric trolley, among other things. Stunts such as that in which Lloyd leaps onto the back of a firetruck, grabs the firehose which begins to unroll from its spool, lowering him despite his best efforts until he's first parallel with the street and then laying in it, or that in which he is riding on top of a driverless trolley, pulls the power rod down to disconnect it from the line and hopefully slow the tram car, ends up hanging from it as it swings off to the right when the trolley goes around a corner, and then drops through the roof of a passing flivver, are as or more dangerous than anything he did in Safety Last. It could almost be termed the first screwball comedy

    Lloyd's character will never have the fascination for me of a Keaton. It's not surprising that his films grossed more than Chaplin's and Keaton's combined, his character matched the personality of the decade, nor that he failed to make a successful transition to sound, that same character being quite out of place in the depression 30's. If Lloyd captured the brash willful abandon of the era, its soul spoke through Buster. His was the articulation of an uncertain universe, which he traveled through as baffled and fascinated, as would be a visitor from another planet. Lloyd virtually willed his own success, painstakingly discovering and honing his craft over an entire decade. To put it in perspective, Safety Last was the 201st of his 218 films. He may have been as Pynchon might put it "a slow learner", (Keaton in contrast began making out and out masterpieces after an apprenticeship of only a dozen or so films over three years, even interrupted by a stint in uniform in France). All the same the results of Lloyd's peak period speak for themselves, very well produced, meticulously paced films and with stunning physical action in perfect harmony with the plot. It must have been something of the nature of the times, the era of the stunt, that birthed so many brilliant acrobatic comedians to make visible the zeitgeist. It seems impossible to imagine anything like it ever occurring again.

Recent topics in "The Silent Majority"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
SF Silent Film Fest this weekend! Liz 0 July 8, 2008
Charley Bowers gidouille 0 August 25, 2007
Roscoe Arbuckle gidouille 4 August 24, 2007
A Fool There Was 1915 MaryEllen 0 August 11, 2007
San Francisco Silent Film Festival Liz 1 July 10, 2007